top of page

We Are Never Giving Up!

ພວກເຮົາຈະບໍ່ມີວັນຍິນຍອມ

 ທ່ານສາມາດອອກຄວາມຄິດກັບພວກເຮົາໄດ້ ແລະ ສາມາດຊ່ວຍເຫລືອປັດໃຈໃຫ້ພວກເຮົາໄດ້ທາງແວບໄຊ້ນີ້ໄດ້ເພື່ອດຳເນີນການຫາສຽງຕໍ່ໄປ

Prisoners of War Missing in Laos

ສະເລີຍເສິກທີ່ຫາຍສາບສູນໃນປະເທດລາວ

By Thomas W. LippmanJanuary 2, 1994


From a huge archive of documents about the Vietnam War declassified in recent months, new evidence is emerging that some American pilots held prisoner in Laos were not released at the end of the war, and that U.S. intelligence officials might have known where some of them were.


The Defense Department lists 330 Americans, almost all pilots and crew, as missing in action in Laos. Most were certainly killed when their planes crashed in the remote jungles of the mountainous, sparsely populated country.


Officially, only two American fliers, Col. Charles Shelton and Lt. Col. David Hrdlicka, are known for certain to have been alive in custody of pro-communist Pathet Lao rebels. Shelton and Hrdlicka died in captivity in the 1960s, Pentagon officials believe. No other reports, whether from human sources or aerial photographs, of Americans held prisoner by the Pathet Lao have ever been verified, according to the Defense Department.


By Bernard Gwertzman Special to The New York Times

Nov. 11, 1976

Credit...The New York Times Archives

See the article in its original context from

November 11, 1976, Page 85Buy Reprints

New York Times subscribers* enjoy full access to TimesMachine—view over 150 years of New York Times journalism, as it originally appeared.


About the Archive

This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.

Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 10—Thousands of former rightist and neutralist Laotians are confined in harsh and repressive internment camps scattered throughout Laos, according to accounts being received here.

The reports, provided mainly in interviews from escaped or released prisoners and from letters from within the camps sent to relatives in Laos, said that the camps differed widely in their levels of severity.


Some of them on islands near the capital, Vientiane, are apparently shortterm “reeducation” facilities to provide such former “undesirables” as prostitutes and wayward teenagers with Communist indoctrination. These camps have been visited by foreign diplomats and journalists.

But 40,000 to 50,000 former members of the anti‐Communist army units in Laos are said to be confined to what amount to forced labor camps, living on minimal food and medicine rations. These former soldiers are reportedly used at such heavylabor tasks as cutting lumber and building canals, and the death rate, is said to be high. These labor camps were set up following the takeover last December by the pro‐Communist Pathet Lao and the collapse of the neutralist government, which was supported by rightists and was led by Prime Minister Souvanna Phouma.


FACTSHEET | April 27, 2021

Progress in Laos

Current Status of Unaccounted-for Americans Lost in the Vietnam War

Vietnam Laos Cambodia China Total

Original Missing 1,973 573 90 10 2,646

Repatriated and Identified 729 288 42 3 1,062[1]

Remaining Missing 1,244 285 48 7 1,584

Of the remaining 285 Americans still unaccounted for in Laos, 11 are in a “non-recoverable” category. This means that as a result of rigorous investigation, we have conclusive evidence the individual perished, but do not believe it possible to recover his remains. On rare occasions, new leads can arise that bring a case back to an active status.


ໃນຈໍານວນຊາວອາເມຣິກັນທີເຫລືອ 285 ຄົນທີ່ບໍ່ໄດ້ລວາມເຂົ້າໃນລາຍຊື່ໃນປະເທສລາວ, ແລະ ມີ 11 ຄົນຢູ່ໃນປະເທສ “ທີ່ບໍ່ສາມາດກູ້ຄືນໄດ້”. ຊຶ່ງໄດ້ມາຈາກການສືບສວນຢ່າງເຂັ້ມງວດ, ພວກເຮົາມີຫຼັກຖານທີ່ແນ່ນອນວ່າບຸກຄົນດັ່ງກ່າວໄດ້ເສັຽຊີວິດແລ້ວ, ແຕ່ບໍ່ເຊື່ອວ່າຈະສາມາດກູ້ເອົາສົບຂອງຜູ້ຕາຍກັບຄືນມາໄດ້ ໃນໂອກາດທີ່ຈະເປັນໄປໄດ້ທີ່ຈະເອົາຊາກສົບຂອງລາວຄືນມາໄດ້ ກໍອາດຈະຂຶ້ນກັບຜູ້ນໍາຊຸດໄຫມ່ທີ່ຈະມາແກ້ໄຂ ແລະນຳເອົາຄະດີຂຶ້ນມາແກ້ໄຂໃຫ້ເປັນໄປຕາມຄວາມຍຸຕິທັມ

Prisoners of War in Laos

ສະເລີຍເສິກທີ່ຫາຍສາບສູນໃນປະເທດລາວ

Laos Table of Contents

The unconditional return of prisoners of war (POWs) from all the countries of Indochina was, in the words of Henry A. Kissinger, the chief United States negotiator at Paris, "one of the premises on which the United States based its signature of the Vietnam agreement." Kissinger said he had received "categorical assurances" from the North Vietnamese delegation in Paris that United States POWs captured in Laos would be released in the same time frame as those from North Vietnam and South Vietnam, that is, by March 28, 1973.


Under the provisions of Chapter II, Article 5 of the Vientiane Agreement, the two sides were obligated to repatriate all persons held captive regardless of nationality within sixty days of the formation of the coalition government. When the cease-fire came, it was generally assumed that the Pathet Lao held a large number of United States citizens they or the North Vietnamese had captured in Laos, and the Department of Defense listed some 555 United States personnel as unaccounted for--either as POWs, missing in action (MIA) or killed in action/body not recovered. The Pathet Lao had released a number of United States prisoners after the formation of the 1962 coalition. There was considerable uncertainty surrounding the POW/MIA question, however, because the Pathet Lao had neither provided lists of those who had fallen into their hands nor adhered to international conventions on treatment of POWs, in keeping with their contention that the United States was guilty of an aggressive, undeclared war against Laos. Conditions of detention in jungle prison camps were harsh in the extreme, as attested to by the few who managed to escape. Prisoners had no medicine, and they had to supplement their ration of rice, both meager and dirty, with beetles and rats.


Soth Petrasy, permanent representative of the Pathet Lao delegation in Vientiane, told Phone Chantaraj, editor of the Vientiane newspaper Xat Lao (The Lao Nation), five days prior to the signing of the Vientiane Agreement that the Pathet Lao leadership had a detailed accounting of United States prisoners and the locations where they were being held and that they would be released after the cease-fire. He added: "If they were captured in Laos, they will be returned in Laos." On the day the Vientiane Agreement was signed, the United States chargé d'affaires obtained confirmation from Soth of his previous statements and requested further details. Although Soth proposed to send a message to Xam Nua asking for the number and names of United States citizens held captive, this information was not forthcoming.


The United States embassy began pressing for the release by March 28 of prisoners captured in Laos. The question was whether the Pathet Lao would consider themselves bound by the agreement with its implication that they followed the orders of the North Vietnamese. Resolution of the matter was further complicated by the fact that procedures for prisoner exchanges stipulated in the Vientiane Agreement had still to be negotiated by the two sides in Laos.


On March 26, Soth informed the United States that the Pathet Lao would release eight prisoners in Hanoi on March 28. These prisoners, whose names had previously been given to United States officials by the North Vietnamese in Paris, had been held in North Vietnam for some time. On March 27, the Pathet Lao delivered a note verbal to the United States embassy that stated this fulfilled their POW release obligations and demanded that the United States pressure the Vientiane government to negotiate "seriously" for implementing the political provisions of the agreement. The Pathet Lao rejected subsequent United States requests to dissociate the question of United States POWs from other matters covered by the Vientiane Agreement. The North Vietnamese, for their part, did not respond to Kissinger's requests for clarification of the discrepancy between the number of POWs and MIAs carried by the Department of Defense and the small number of POWs released.


The protocol giving effect to the Vientiane Agreement was signed on September 14, 1973. Paragraph 18 made the two-party Joint Central Commission to Implement the Agreement responsible for implementing provisions for exchanges of prisoners and information. The names of personnel who had died in captivity were to be exchanged within fifteen to thirty days, and all prisoners were to be released within sixty days after formation of the coalition government. However, the only United States citizen released by the Pathet Lao in Laos in accordance with these provisions was a civilian pilot captured after the cease-fire. For the next twenty years, representatives of the new regime would sit at a table and calmly inform visiting United States officials and families of POW/MIAs that they knew nothing about the fate of United States POWs and MIAs in Laos.

Lao PDR: Five Years after Arrest, Human Rights Defenders Still Denied Access to Lawyers - UN Expert

GENEVA (12 April 2021) – A UN expert called on the Government of Lao PDR to immediately release three human rights defenders who have been detained for more than five years, saying their continued imprisonment was an impediment to the advancement of human rights in the South-East Asian nation.


A court in the capital, Vientiane, sentenced Ms. Lodkham Thammavong, Mr. Soukane Chaithad and Mr. Somphone Phimmasone to prison terms of up to 20 years in 2017 after they took part in a demonstration outside the Lao Embassy in Thailand to express concerns over the government’s human rights record. The three, who were arrested in March 2016, had also posted messages on social media criticizing the Government.


Mary Lawlor, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, said the activists had not only been deprived of their liberty but also their right to a fair and free trial. “To date, none of the above human rights defenders have had access to their lawyers,” she said.


“I am deeply concerned that these three human rights defenders have been criminalized and sentenced respectively to 12, 16 and 20 years imprisonment in retaliation for their legitimate human rights work and criticism of the Government’s alleged human rights violations, corruption and deforestation.”


“The misuse of national security laws to convict human rights defenders who are critical of the Government generates fear amongst all human rights defenders in the country and has had an adverse effect on their ability to carry out their legitimate human rights work,” Lawlor said. “The Government must guarantee a safe, secure and enabling environment for all human rights defenders.


“The Government must provide the legal and factual basis behind the arbitrary arrest and incommunicado pre-trial detention of Ms. Lodkham Thammavong, Mr. Soukane Chaithad and Mr. Somphone Phimmasone,” Lawlor said. “The Government should also explain the harsh prison sentences handed down to these human rights defenders, and how these are compatible with international human rights norms and standards.”

The expert’s call has been endorsed by: Ms Leigh Toomey (Chair-Rapporteur), Ms. Elina Steinerte (Vice-Chair), Miriam Estrada-Castillo, Mumba Malila, Mr Seong-Phil Hong, Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; and Mr. Clément Nyaletsossi Voule, Special Rapporteur on the right to peaceful assembly and association.


ENDS

Ms Mary Lawlor, (Ireland) is the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders. She is currently an Adjunct Professor of Business and Human Rights in Trinity College Dublin. She was the founder of Front Line Defenders - the International Foundation for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders. As Executive Director from 2001-2016, she represented Front Line Defenders and had a key role in its development. Ms. Lawlor was the Director of the Irish Section of Amnesty International from 1988 to 2000, became a Board member in 1975 and was elected Chair from 1983 to 1987.


Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.


For more information and media requests please contact Orsolay Toth (+41 22 917 9913 /ototh@ohchr.org) or write to defenders@ohchr.org

For media inquiries regarding other UN independent experts, please contact Renato de Souza ( +41 22 928 9855 / rrosariodesouza@ohchr.org), Jeremy Laurence (+ 41 22 917 7578 / jlaurence@ohchr.org) and Kitty McKinsey (kmckinsey@ohchr.org)

Follow news related to the UN's independent human rights experts on Twitter@UN_SPExperts.

Concerned about the world we live in?

Then STAND UP for someone's rights today.

#Standup4humanrights

bottom of page